used without persmision, for "fair use" only


Interview with Vladimir Srebrov

with Adil Kulenovic, Vreme, Belgrade, FR Yugoslavia, 10/30/1995

Writer Vladimir Srebrov, one of the founders of the Serbian Democratic Party (SDS) in Bosnia-Hercegovina (BH), was put in jail by those who took over from him the leadership of that party. In the meantime, he has "spent" a short time in another party and from a nationalist Srebrov was transformed into a supporter of a civic Bosnia-Hercegovina. After 39 months spent in jail he has returned to Sarajevo. He spoke for Vreme about his former friends, days in prison, Sarajevo...

Mr Srebrov, you were one of the founders of the Serb Democratic Party. What were the goals of the party at the time you founded it?

I am not one of the founders of the party; I am a legal signatory of all documents about the founding of SDS in Bosnia-Hercegovina. SDS was conceived as a national movement of the Serbian people in Bosnia-Hercegovina. As you already know, in 1990 and 1991, it was only possible to gather a people under a national banner. Before us, SDA [largest Muslim party in BH] and HDZ BiH [Faction of the ruling Croatian party in Bosnia-Hercegovina, today the largest Croatian party in BH], and we wanted to see their programs and to find out how those parties would be accepted in BH as national parties.

At that time I was too much of an optimist since I believed that the nationalist phase would last for a short time and that SDS would transform itself in a civic party which would support the development of BH into a secular, civic state. In the end, because of that ideal I've been detained for 39 months in the jail in Kula.

At a certain moment you distanced yourself from the party you helped to found. Why?

I had come under tremendous pressure to accept a plan which, as I was subsequently to learn, had been drawn up not in 1990, but in the 1980s. This was the famous 'Ram Plan', the aim of which was to destroy Bosnia economically and completely exterminate its Muslim people. I was terribly shocked. I am not exaggerating when I say that I felt terrible pain when I heard about this from people who had been my friends for almost twenty years. The plan was drawn up in the 1980s by the General Staff of what was then the Yugoslav People's Army (JNA). It envisaged a division of Bosnia into two spheres of interest, leading to the creation of a Greater Serbia and a Greater Croatia. The Muslims were to be subjected to a final solution: more than 50% of them were to be killed, a smaller part was to be converted to Orthodoxy, while an even smaller part - those with money, of course - was to be allowed to leave for Turkey, by way of a so-called 'Turkish corridor'.

What was a so-called 'Turkish corridor', which has been mentioned in the public from time to time?

People with money, were to be allowed to buy their lives and leave, probably, through Serbia, for Turkey. The aim was to cleanse Bosnia-Herzegovina completely of the Muslim nation, and to divide the country along the River Vrbas. The very name of Bosnia was to disappear. This was the aim behind the creation of 'Republika Srpska'.

From what you say it would seem that the war in Bosnia- Herzegovina did not start spontaneously.

Of course not. This war was conceived by the General Staff of the former JNA. One day this evidence will be found: as I know, it is a two-page typed document outlining what to do with Bosnia in the future, though when the plan would become operational was not stated. General Kukanjac referred to this plan in a television interview, when he also said that he would soon be publishing his memoirs. These, unfortunately, have not come out, since Kukanjac knew it all, and it would be interesting to know how the military plan for the destruction of Bosnia-Herzegovina was actually made. There was also another plan - the Memorandum [of the Serbian Academy of Arts and Sciences] - which was the spiritual complement of the military one. The main ideologist of the Memorandum in Bosnia-Herzegovina was Milorad Ekmecic. I intentionally omit to mention his doctoral title, because he proved to be a great coward, an inhuman person and a great enemy of Bosnia-Herzegovina. You remember that in 1992, in an interview with Dubravka Kenic, Milorad Ekmecic said that that 100,000 victims were not a too great a price to pay for the Greater Serbian idea (I am paraphrasing this, but that's basically what he said).

In March 1992, in conversation with an SDS delegation, Ekmecic said that the Serb people was ready to sacrifice at least 100,000 to 200,000 lives in order to realize its historical aims. He also said that the Serbian people uprising would be like a French revolution.

Before the war I held Milorad Ekmecic in high regard as an intellectual. But he did not use the great respect he enjoyed among the Serbs to direct them in the positive direction. He should have ended up, like me, in the Kula prison. It is shameful for the Serb intellectuals of Bosnia-Herzegovina that I alone among them was imprisoned for his beliefs in the so- called Republika Srpska. It would have been better if at least 1,000 of them had ended up in prison.

How do you judge the responsibility of the Serb intelligentsia for the fate of the Serb people, not only in Bosnia-Herzegovina but also in Croatia?

They proved to be real cowards, which was incredibly surprising for me. Most of them turned out to be nonentities. We must make an exception here, of course, for Mrs Vesna Pesic and a small number of intellectuals in Serbia, who have protested. I am surprised they have not been killed or imprisoned because of their views.

Radovan Karadzic is undoubtedly a person who will leave his mark on the destiny of the Serb people in Bosnia- Herzegovina.

You mean Radovan Karadzic the criminal, Radovan Karadzic the embezzler.

The way he is treated by the international community

I am surprised that you don't refer to him as doctor Radovan Karadzic. You may remember that in 1990-1, when he started to be promoted by certain circles in the political and academic establishment of Serbia, I was saying that he - like Krajisnik - was an embezzler, and that such people could not be Serb national leaders. The proof of his criminal past can be found in the archives of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Ministry of the Interior.

However, it is he who influences decisively the fate of the Serb nation today.

No, not at all. You are making a big mistake here. Those who hold power are not in Bosnia but in Serbia. I have in mind, in particular, President of Serbia Milosevic and former President of 'Yugoslavia' Dobrica Cosic. Milosevic also engineered my removal from the SDS leadership in 1990.

Nevertheless, even as an instrument of Slobodan Milosevic's political will, Radovan Karadzic is officially in power.

You keep talking about him as a government, but he is nothing but a common swindler. Those who are protecting him and working with him are mainly criminals. He is an insane person, chosen - I say this openly - by the Serbian leadership as their instrument for the destruction of Bosnia-Herzegovina. They chose Radovan Karadzic because he was already known as somebody who hated Sarajevo and Bosnia-Herzegovina. He was a member of the Bosnia-Herzegovina Writers' Association. As its members we knew that he was working for the police, that he spied on us for the police. Being a man of no moral integrity, he was a suitable person to implement the plan to destroy Bosnia-Herzegovina. Please, read his speeches and you will realise that he is worse than Hitler.

It is indisputable that in this war the Bosniak-Muslims have suffered most, and that the Croats have suffered as well. Not enough is known, however, about the suffering of the Serbs.

When we talk of genocide against the Muslim people, we must at the same time speak of the genocide against the Serb people. But this genocide against the Serb people has been conducted by no other body but the SDS leadership - what goes by the name of the Presidency of the so-called Republika Srpska. It is well known that 150,000 Serbs between the ages of 18 and 30 have died in this war, which means that Serbs in Bosnia-Herzegovina have been biologically destroyed - they have become a nation of old people.

It would be wrong to classify the Bosnian Serbs as a genocidal nation. According to the pre-war census, there were 1,350,000 of us Serbs here. Only a core of about 20-30,000 people set out to commit massacres in Bosnia-Herzegovina. They were later supported by some 270,000 more. But 1,000,000 have not taken part in the war. Imagine what an army 1,300,000 Serbs could have created, if they had all wished to destroy Bosnia- Herzegovina. Bosnia-Herzegovina would not have survived. I must say that we were politically inexperienced, because we allowed the JNA to take its weapons out of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Those weapons were later returned to the fronts in Bosnia- Herzegovina and used to wage war.

Let me mention a well known thought: "While Zagreb and Belgrade talk about rationalism, people in Bosnia die." What do you think about the involvement of the Serbian Writers' Association in this war?

Serbian Writer's Association was a progressive and courageous organization before this war; in this war it turned into nothing. I am surprised by the downfall of the Serbian writers. Their protests were insignificant. Serbian Writers' Association has as a member one Gojko Dogo. A while ago, I used to sign petitions for his release from jail; recently that same man publicly demanded that I be shot to death with all other detainees... What happened with Dorde Sladoj? And Adam Puslojic? What happened with the large number of my, I must say former, friends from the Serbian Writers' Association, whose voice hasn't been heard. I didn't expect them to try to protect me, far from that. But they should have simply spoke out about the events in Bosnia-Hercegovina.

Why did you remain in Sarajevo?

Before the war, I was not too keen on Sarajevo. I lived in lodgings, which was miserable. As a student I experienced all kinds of hardships and when I started to work I suffered a lot of unpleasantness. But when I reviewed it all, I realised that all this negative experience was part of life, that it could not negate my belonging to Sarajevo and Bosnia- Herzegovina, that my life was tied to this city and to Bosnia- Herzegovina. It was this that made me (gave me the strength to) say to myself: 'Wait, your place is in Sarajevo. Whatever happens to its inhabitants will happen to you as well. If every Sarajevo citizen is to be killed by a bomb, then you will be killed as well. But do not run away.' When I was in prison , I used to say: 'My only desire is to take a walk from Marin-Dvor to Bascarsija.' Why? In your city you are a citizen, because a hundred people greet you. You are a citizen because you communicate with thousands of others like you, because you know every house, you know so much. Abroad you are nobody.

39 months ago you, in the middle of this city's cataclysm, you made a suicidal gesture by going on what can be described as a mission of good will, probably hoping to be able to bring those who were systematically shelling this city to their senses. How do you see that act now?

I went to meet the SDS leaders because I hoped I would be able to sit down with them and talk to them about three things. The first was the feeding of the 60-80,000 Serbs who remained in Sarajevo. They were surviving thanks to [the Muslim charity] 'Merhamet' and [the Catholic charity] 'Caritas' - whereas [the Orthodox charity] 'Dobrotvor' existed only on paper. The second was the opening of a corridor through Ilijas - a corridor of life for Bosnia and Sarajevo. The idea was to allow all those who wished to leave Sarajevo to go, and those who wished to come in to do so. It did not occur to me then that they wished practically to dig up Sarajevo, to kill its complete population and turn it into a field of wheat. But this is precisely what they did intend to do. The third thing I wanted to tell them was: 'Stop shelling. Most of those who get killed are children.'

Instead of being received by your former associates, you were arrested. What can you tell us about the days you spent in prison?

I don't want to talk a lot about prison. That cannot be described. I was sentenced to be shot to death; later that sentence was reduced to 10 years in jail, then to 5 and finally to three years. At the end of my jail term they refused to release me since supposedly, the political situation wasn't appropriate etc. Why didn't they kill me? I've asked that question myself many times and I think that I know the answer: because of the public opinion.

While you were in prison, were you ever visited by someone, someone whose visit you expected, or someone whose visit you didn't expect?

I didn't expect a visit from my jailers, but they did visit the prison. For a while they threw parties at the prison. Imagine: on one side there were people who had no food, datainees and war prisoners, and on the other people who don't know what to do with their food. At the Kula prison, there was a room, which was visible from behind the bars. That was a so called function hall, where Nikola Koljevic [Bosnian Serb vicepresident] was a frequent guest. They threw parties for his visits, played gusle [traditional Serb folk instrument], drink, eat, had orgies. However, Nikola Koljevic never came to visit, although he only had to walk 50 meters to mu cell. Ljubomir Zukovic showed up once and his first sentence was: 'You know what's up? Nobody knows I'm here.'

Can you imagine a culture minister who would say something like that? Isn't that absurd? I have to mention my good professor, Dr. Josip Besic, who payed me a visit; he looked like a ghost, and I have to say that he risked his own life by doing that. we talked for about half an hour, in police presence, of course, and he told me that he was leaving for Novi Sad to 'Sterijino Pozorje' [Serbian theater festival]. A month later, I heard that he had died from a heart attack while sitting at a table in the hotel 'Park' in Novi Sad. They didn't allow his wife Rava to see me, but her message and present did reach me later and are very dear to me. Since I still cannot reach Rava, I would like to on this occasion extend my best wishes.

You could get asylum in practically any country. You have, nevertheless, chosen to stay in Sarajevo. Why?

Why should I go away? To lecture at some university abroad? I do not need that. When I was in prison, Radovan Karadzic and Nikola Koljevic used to send emissaries to tell me that I should apply for 'Republika Srpska' citizenship and promised me a good life. But from the very first day I used to tell them: 'I only want to be in Sarajevo. The only place I want to go to is Sarajevo.' That is that. Bosnia-Herzegovina is my country and Sarajevo is the city in which I want to live. Never mind that Sarajevo is destroyed, for we shall rebuild it. We will make it the cultural, political and economic centre of the Balkans. It is meant to be that way. That is clear.


Vladimir Srebrov

Date and place of birth: Vladimir Srebrov was born on 10/23/1954 in Pozarevac (Serbia) as Milan Nikolic, son of a JNA officer and a teacher.

Nationality: "A Serb by birth, declared Yugoslav, Slav by soul." ("Nedjelja", August 1990)

Education and Career: Completed primary and high school in Travnik and Banja Luka. Graduated from the philosophy department at the Sarajevo University. Enraptured by the Panslavic movement, during graduate studies in USSR changed his name to Srebrov. Before the war, he was in charge of the Philosophical Faculty library of the University of Sarajevo. He has published four books of poetry.

Political views: Liable to sudden and drastic changes. In 1990 he was a founding member of the Serb Democratic Party (SDS), whose leader became Radovan Karadzic. He was a leader of Mlada Bosna (militant youth wing of SDS), then for a while an official of the Serbian Renewal Movement [Serbian nationalist, opposition party] for Bosnia-Hercegovina; he left SRM because of a clash with its leader, Vuk Draskovic. Immediately before the outbreak of the war, after the resignation of the SDS members Nikola Koljevic and Biljana Plavsic [today both vicepresidents of Srpska Republic], he suggested to Izetbegovic to appoint him for a Serb representative to the Bosnian presidency (he was rejected). In late March 1992, he warned Serb intellectuals - at their famous congress held in Sarajevo - that the quest for a Serb ethnic state in Bosnia-Herzegovina was leading the nation to war and genocide; he also accused Karadzic of corruption and was removed from the hall. For a while he cooperated with Davor Perinovic, then president of the Croatian Rights party (HSS) and the former president of HDZ BiH. After the outbreak of the war, he decides to stay in Sarajevo and founds a Civic Party whose member he remains until today.

Why was he expelled from SDS?: because of extreme Serb nationalism: after Srebrov's invitation to the JNA to take over the power in Bosnia and his promise that his "iron guards" would help in that, Radovan Karadzic decided in 1990 that "para-militaristic, almost militant outbursts of M.A. Vladimir Srebrov are foreign to the spirit of the Serb people"; Karadzic disbanded Mlada Bosna and suspended Srebrov.

When and how was he arrested?: In early September 1992, after obtaining personal safety guarantees from both the Bosnian government and Pale, he went to meet Karadzic and Nikola Koljevic in the occupied Sarajevo suburb of Ilidza, to discuss with them the situation of the Sarajevo Serbs. On his arrival he was promptly arrested, beaten up and imprisoned in Kula.

What was he sentenced for?: Karadzic's military court at Han Pijesak charged him with committing, through his appearances on Sarajevo television, 'the criminal act of attempting to weaken army morale and sow unrest among the soldiers', and also 'other acts that could be interpreted as high treason'. Srebrov was condemned to five years (later reduced to three) in prison.

How did Sarajevo react?: General Sefer Halilovic, who was then commander of the Bosnian Army, offered to exchange him for several Republika Srpska army officers, but the offer was rejected.

And Belgrade?: state-controlled press greeted his arrest and wrote that "Srebrov gained 14 pounds in jail," and that "he cannot return to Alija's [Izetbegovic, Bosnian president] Sarajevo, because he would be slaughtered, since they slaughter all Serbs there." Serbian Writer's Association stated that Srebrov's arrest had been "hasty". Out of all political parties in Serbia only the Serbian renewal Movement, Civic Association [Vesna Pesic's party] and Serbian Liberal party demanded his release from Dobrica Cosic, then the president of FR Yugoslavia. Without success.

How did he behave in jail?: In the few interviews he gave to the independent Belgrade media (Radio 92 and Borba) during his term in prison, he consistently refused to show remorse and continued to insist that Karadzic's SDS was leading Bosnian Serbs into a catastrophe. Consequences: three broken ribs and water in one knee.

What did he say about his jailers?: "I completely understand them. It was hard for them to listen to me in those times. I was too well known and too independent in my thinking; consequently, I was dangerous for them." [He was recently released and now lives in Sarajevo.]

by Dejan Anastasijevic


Translated on 2/25/96 (part of translation taken from Bosnia-Timor page)
HOME