used without permission, for "fair use" only

New Draft referendum Law Assessed By International Community As Step Back - According To OSCE Recommendation At Least 223,000 Votes Needed For Independence

by Nd.R. and V.J.

Vijesti, Podgorica, Montenegro, FR Yugoslavia, November 6, 2001

The Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) did not support the new draft referendum law, which is supposed to enter procedure this week in the Parliament of Montenegro. The OSCE recommended a qualified majority as a condition for the validity of the referendum.

The OSCE suggested that the law specify that at least 223,000 votes cast by Montenegrin citizens, corresponding to 50 percent plus one vote of all registered voters, are needed for a valid decision in a referendum. This suggestion corresponds to the demand of the coalition "Together for Yugoslavia".

The proposal of the Liberal Alliance (LSCG) and the SDP, that the turnout of more than 50 percent of all registered voters not be a requirement for a successful referendum and that a valid decision required only support of more than 50 percent of voters participating in a referendum, was assessed as 'a step back in comparison with the current legal norms in Montenegro".

"The issue of suitable majority is of crucial importance for building of trust, both by local and international public, in a possible future referendum process. The OSCE Bureau for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights cannot recommend dropping of all qualified and established mechanisms because the legitimacy of a referendum with participation of less than 50 percent of registered voters would be open to questioning and criticism both within the country and abroad. The attempt to apply pressure on the opposition with such means is likely to backfire and may result in further increase in political polarization," states the expert opinion of the OSCE about the draft referendum law.

The OSCE emphasizes that there are no clear international standards about the required majorities needed for valid referendum decisions, but that "the best international practice indicates that some level of established or qualified majority is desirable as it reduces the likelihood that the result of a referendum would be disputed, and preserves stability". The expert opinion adds that the condition of qualified majority reduces the likelihood that a referendum will be repeated after small shifts in public opinion.

According to the OSCE opinion, if the turnout in a referendum is 65 percent of registered voters, a valid pro-independence vote would require 76.9 percent vote in favor; if the turnout is 70 percent, qualified majority would be 71.4 percent; if the turnout is 75 percent, the qualified majority would be 66.7 percent, while with the turnout of 80 percent, the qualified majority would be 62.5 percent.

Comparing this data with the number of registered voters, the OSCE calculation boils down to the recommendation that support of more than a half of all registered voters, or more than 223,000 voters, is needed for renewal of Montenegrin statehood. The OSCE has also stuck with the view that two questions can be asked in a referendum, while the solution that the period between a calling of a referendum and the actual vote should not be shorter than two months or longer than six months was assessed as reasonable.

As the draft referendum law states that results of a referendum oblige the parliament, and there are different interpretations of the Montenegrin constitution regarding that issue, the OSCE recommends that the Constitutional Court of Montenegro "address that issue before any referendum is held".

"The OSCE Bureau for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights recommends that political parties in Montenegro work together on reaching consensus regarding legal regulations for the holding of a referendum, given that the future of the country and stability of the whole region is at stake. The expert opinion of the OSCE Bureau for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights about the draft referendum law should not be in any case interpreted as support for the holding of referendum or approval of a certain referendum question. The opinion was prepared at request of Montenegrin authorities, with the aim of giving an assessment of its correspondence to international standards," the yesterday's OSCE press release states.

Montenegrins Living In Serbia Cannot Vote

The OSCE opinion emphasizes that "it cannot be recommended that citizens/nationals of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia of Montenegrin origin who live in Serbia be given the right of vote in a referendum in Montenegro". The opinion adds that the condition for participation in a referendum should be 24 months residency in Montenegro, which is the same as the requirement for voting in general elections.

SDP Does Not Give Up For Now

"The SDP will stick with its proposal during the debate on the new referendum law, but it will also be open to all improvements that can be reached by consensus within the wider Montenegrin coalition. In any case the SDP will not support any solutions that would prompt the right to boycott and allow political forces that oppose the referendum and the declaration of independence of Montenegro to count on their side those voters who, for various reasons, do not vote," Rifat Rastoder, vice-president of the SDP, said yesterday for Vijesti. He said that the OSCE experts, in their analysis of the draft referendum law, whose goal is to prevent boycott, did not take stands, and that they ultimately concluded that international law does not offer any standards regarding this issue. "OSCE experts recommend that qualified majority of cast votes be defined, which does not go against the solution offered by the draft law. Montenegrin parties should test their arguments and try to align this legal project, as much as possible, with the OSCE analysis as well," Rastoder concluded.

DPS Calls For Talks About Qualified Majority

Vice-president of the parliament and senior official of the DPS Dragan Kujovic stated yesterday for Vijesti that the level of qualified majority necessary for a valid decision about the independence of Montenegro in a referendum is a matter for Montenegrin dialog. Kujovic said that he expected dialog that would result in agreement about the conditions and rules for an independence referendum. "Citizens need the state of Montenegro that will be respected in Montenegro and recognized abroad," Kujovic said. He added that he could not say what qualified majority was acceptable for the DPS. Kujovic said that the opinion of the OSCE is yet another opinion in favor of the DPS views in this matter. Emphasizing that OSCE analysis is "catastrophic" for the DPS, and that the work of the Commission for the Creation of the Referendum Law was a total failure, SNP spokesperson Dragan Koprivica said that this is another strike against the failed DPS policies, especially in the part that recommends qualified majority. "So far the DPS has been avoiding qualified majority in any way they could, and they will now finally realize that without taking into account the views of the SNP and the coalition For Yugoslavia, which represents almost a half of all voters in Montenegro, there can be no agreement. In the meantime, the DPS has given a strong indication that it opposes dialog by abolishing the Commission for Investigation of the Tobacco Affair. It is clear that establishment of a new commission would be one of preconditions for the start of dialog," the SNP spokesperson said.


Translated on September 16, 2002
Vijesti